Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 270u 27 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Memory 53.4 1-Core 28.1 2-Core 47.2 30% 42.9 Pts	4-Core 47.9 8-Core 56.4 7% 52.2 Pts	64-Core 56.1 4% 56.1 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84F6) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.33% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.9 Parallax 1.8 3% 3.9 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.33% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 55 54 55 60 62 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.8% Poor	Read 156 Write 56.1 Mixed 81.1 SusWrite 50 19% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 9.8 31% 9.9 MB/s	DQ Read 72.2 DQ Write 53.6 DQ Mixed 31.2 32% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 55%
Hitachi HCS5C1025CLA382 250GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 224GB free Firmware: JC1OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 101 107 106 105 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 108 Write 109 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 105 68% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.1% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 8.1 22% 7.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.7 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16