Gigabyte GA-Z87MX-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z87MX-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87MX-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 18:26
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 202
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 335
49% 358 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 18.5
15% 18.2 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 325 402 418 418 424 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 467
Write 405
Mixed 349
SusWrite 382
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 32
106% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 270
205% 282 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
437GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 137 142 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 123
Write 38.7
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 139
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 77%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
308GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 178 183 184 182 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 143
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 180
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.5
435% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 112%
WDC WD50 00BPVT-22A1YT0 500GB
423GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 36 37 37 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 34.2
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 35.3
41% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87MX-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87MX-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback