Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 22:17
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 737
76% 614 Pts
64-Core 734
45% 734 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.4% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 92.7
54% 75.9 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 53.3
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 62%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 927 481 486 484 489 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,312
Write 1,456
Mixed 538
SusWrite 517
214% 956 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 48.5
178% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 531
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 423
342% 483 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 162%
Great: 311%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
640GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 141
Write 25
Mixed 76.9
61% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
165% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
76% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 21.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $650
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback