Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0NVVG0
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 22:09
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 68.9
1-Core 175
2-Core 275
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 728
77% 614 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Dell(1028 09FF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 28
Parallax 30.7
22% 28.6 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 20.8
21% 25.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG40ZPZ512G KIOXIA 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10400105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 778 806 422 324 285 328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,151
Write 956
Mixed 923
SusWrite 491
197% 880 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 46.5
152% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 907
DQ Write 402
DQ Mixed 676
495% 662 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 153%
Great: 194%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 60.4
MC Mixed 43.7
138% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 47.5
SC Mixed 19.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 125%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 13 9310 2-in-1 Builds (Compare 653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Dell XPS 13 9310 2-in-1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback