Alienware Aurora R7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R7  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0VDT73
Memory50.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 20:55
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 249
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 778
77% 629 Pts
64-Core 1,000
62% 1,000 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Dell(1028 3301) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.1% Very good
Lighting 94.2
Reflection 107
Parallax 98.7
77% 99.8 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 94.7
Splatting 95.1
78% 95.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 670 452 391 342 312 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 2,070
Write 661
Mixed 660
SusWrite 413
208% 951 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 57.3
180% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 832
DQ Write 576
DQ Mixed 702
525% 703 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 196%
Great: 363%
PNY CS1311 960GB-$195
11GB free
Firmware: CS131122
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 452
Mixed 360
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 21.3
108% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 206
190% 292 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 108%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
106GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 204 201 197 195 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 454
Mixed 408
SusWrite 210
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 50.6
158% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 337
241% 313 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 132%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
41GB free
Firmware: MS2OA810
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 7.5 5.8 2.4 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.63% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 11.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 7.7
4% 5.68 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 2.63%
Great: 107%
G-drive USB-C 18TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 31 3.5 39 71 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 101
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 30.3
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
50% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 29
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 23.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R7 Builds (Compare 5,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Alienware Aurora R7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $428
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback