Asus P5N-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P5N-D (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100107
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '21 at 16:44
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130 8,675 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Memory 68.5 1-Core 24.6 2-Core 45.4 34% 46.2 Pts	4-Core 43.6 8-Core 43.2 6% 43.4 Pts	64-Core 43.9 3% 43.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770 16,639 User benchmarks, average bench 10% XFX(1682 315B) 1GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 12.102.1.1000 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	5.26% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 6.4 Parallax 8.7 5% 7.13 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 6.4 6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 5.26% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 578GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 11 11 9.8 14 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 98.3 Write 66.8 Mixed 69 SusWrite 10.8 46% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 62%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 236GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 117 119 118 113 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 118 Write 116 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 120 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 69%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 57GB free Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 51 51 49 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 58.3 Write 59.8 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 50.6 39% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 35%
Maxtor 6 Y250P0 251GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 234GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 20 18 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.3% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 32.5 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 18.8 37% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 19%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 265GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 19 17 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 31 Write 27.5 Mixed 26 SusWrite 17.8 34% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 20%
USB Disk 2.0 64GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 0125 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 3.3 3 0.6 4.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	4.2% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 1 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 3.1 8% 7.42 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.2% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-D

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	21x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	18x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	7x
GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples	7x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	5x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	55x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16