HP ENVY Desktop 795-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ENVY Desktop 795-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844C
Memory14.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201125
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '21 at 06:07
Run Duration901 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 249
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 642
66% 531 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.93
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45% Average
Lighting 53.7
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 24.2
44% 35.7 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 53.8
47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 134 120 77 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 781
Write 152
Mixed 249
SusWrite 68.3
68% 313 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3.9
60% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 166%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
23GB free
Firmware: VX14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 105 107 116 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 80.7
Write 110
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 105
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 106%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 35 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 36.5
Write 36.7
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 24
43% 32 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43DB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43DB2-CTD 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY Desktop 795-0xxx Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: HP ENVY Desktop 795-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback