Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160329
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '17 at 16:55
Run Duration	369 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 83.3 1-Core 53.7 2-Core 107 52% 81.2 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 288 30% 241 Pts	64-Core 288 18% 288 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 3683) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Lighting 65.1 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 59.2 53% 63.9 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 63.3 Splatting 54.7 51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 117 149359450 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 101575976561523 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2343 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 646 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 29 78 42954784797 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 149359450 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 149359450 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 149359450 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11817 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9458 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9458 (F2) Unknown 0 0 26400	30.4% Below average	Read 194 Write 96 Mixed 118 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 10.3 51% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.3 DQ Write 54.9 DQ Mixed 6.85 14% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 83%
Seagate ST3300620AS 300GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 84GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 81 140625931 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6916 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 31 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 473085268763 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 17775 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6191 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 35 538968096 (C2) HDA temperature 32 65 55834574880 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 68 58 213334513 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 10 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	42.3% Average	Read 73.7 Write 73.6 Mixed 72.4 55% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.39 95% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	3.57% Terrible	Read 13.5 Write 3.36 Mixed 4.63 7% 7.17 MB/s	4K Read 3.69 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.003 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.57% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB 694 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29% Poor	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 10.1 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7.6 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	48x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	27x
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
PM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,882 samples	4x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 10 samples	4x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 58%, 5,634 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $642

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16