MSI MS-17E8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL75 Leopard 10SCSR
MotherboardMSI MS-17E8  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 20:55
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 797
74% 618 Pts
64-Core 947
59% 947 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12BA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e1000 1024G 1TB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111H0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 597 508 266 395 333 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 1,472
Mixed 856
SusWrite 424
230% 1,029 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 22.5
167% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 888
DQ Write 860
DQ Mixed 483
470% 743 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 167%
Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 0898 KD48GS88C-26N1900 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 22.5
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 25.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E8 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback