Asus X99-E

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170811
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '21 at 16:18
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 94.4 1-Core 118 2-Core 236 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 722 74% 597 Pts	64-Core 913 56% 913 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.9 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 20.5 18% 20.2 fps	MRender 24.8 Gravity 23 Splatting 16.5 17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 EVO 500GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 259 270 257 236 270 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 468 Mixed 381 SusWrite 267 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 53.3 180% 61.9 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 231 203% 305 MB/s
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 118%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB 310 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 16GB free, PID 5100 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 10 11 9.2 9.1 11 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 37.5 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 10.5 37% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.5 111% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C15 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C15 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C15 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C15 32GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	MC Read 46.7 MC Write 60.1 MC Mixed 48.1 148% 51.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 22 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 58.7 68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	270x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	88x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	100x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	22x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $448

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16