Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAi
Memory	59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120813
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '21 at 09:01
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 130 56% 91.6 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 395 40% 323 Pts	64-Core 933 58% 933 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1S02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 74 41 51 51 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 115 Write 110 Mixed 95.8 SusWrite 66.4 72% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 76%
Toshiba MK2002TS 2TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 360GB free Firmware: MT4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 93 92 96 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 97 Write 99.8 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 94.2 62% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 82%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98 1,657 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 15GB free Firmware: 0-30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 15.9 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 16.1 16% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 32%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 669GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 83 85 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 85.6 Write 85.2 Mixed 46 SusWrite 83.9 55% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 51%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 931GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 85 84 82 84 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 84.3 Write 88.6 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 84.5 57% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 178 178 177 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 141 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 178 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83% Excellent	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 31.1 96% 33.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.2 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 83%

Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X9DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	8x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16