Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAi
Memory	59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '21 at 13:36
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 53.9 1-Core 64.1 2-Core 126 47% 81.3 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 489 44% 369 Pts	64-Core 916 57% 916 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1S02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 57 59 53 67 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 19.3 Write 70.5 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 61.7 32% 44 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 36% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 76%
Toshiba MK2002TS 2TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 841GB free Firmware: MT4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 116 114 117 117 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 99 Write 122 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 116 72% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 82%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98 1,657 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 44GB free Firmware: 0-30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 17.5 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 18.3 18% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 32%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 875GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 81 81 83 80 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 91.5 Write 87.3 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 81.5 58% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 51%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 18GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 44 48 56 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 64.8 Write 65.5 Mixed 42 SusWrite 47.7 41% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$64 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 190 189 185 187 190 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 147 Mixed 78 SusWrite 187 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	MC Read 37.1 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 30.6 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X9DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16