Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 05:40
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 62.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 253
79% 149 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 727
73% 593 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.8% Very good
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 135
Parallax 147
48% 114 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 133
Splatting 116
114% 144 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 960GB-$65
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c89
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 363 363 369 369 368 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 386
Write 348
Mixed 316
SusWrite 353
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 20.1
63% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 192
142% 186 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 108%
Corsair Force GS 240GB-$261
32GB free
Firmware: 5.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 207 203 193 197 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 401
Write 237
Mixed 273
SusWrite 200
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 33.8
122% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 154
136% 204 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76%
Great: 93%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
142GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1329 973 943 790 407 396 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,126
Write 1,976
Mixed 1,496
SusWrite 806
358% 1601 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 51
188% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 1,142
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 1,082
810% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 240%
Great: 372%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB
208GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 73
Write 75.7
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 56.9
84% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 44%
Apple iPod 16GB
1GB free, PID 1265
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 2.1 5.2 3.3 3.4 2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 9.7
Mixed 3
SusWrite 3.4
9% 7.47 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 6%
WD Elements 2TB
151GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 30
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 36.8
43% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 25.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 19.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $820
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback