Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory52.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 09:10
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 62.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 241
78% 145 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 731
73% 593 Pts
64-Core 823
51% 823 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.6% Above average
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 134
Parallax 18.9
24% 60.9 fps
MRender 161
Gravity 124
Splatting 108
104% 131 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 960GB-$65
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c89
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 309 320 271 259 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 257
Write 213
Mixed 219
SusWrite 286
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 20
52% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 172
132% 177 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 108%
Corsair Force GS 240GB-$261
55GB free
Firmware: 5.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 214 208 183 195 188 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.6% Above average
Read 183
Write 114
Mixed 212
SusWrite 200
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 25
66% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 156
135% 200 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 93%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
500GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1650 1787 1432 877 824 546 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,689
Write 1,318
Mixed 811
SusWrite 1,186
280% 1,251 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 44.6
143% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,100
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 1,050
772% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 229%
Great: 372%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB
203GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 54 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 51.8
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 54.5
63% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 44%
Apple iPod 16GB
1GB free, PID 1265
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.4 2.2 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 3.5
9% 7.73 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 6%
WD Elements 2TB
151GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 35.7
39% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 26.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback