Asus P5G41-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5G41-M LE  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 03:47
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 85.9
43% 66.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
EVGA(3842 C959) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 1
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 45 35 39 38 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22% Poor
Read 159
Write 65.8
Mixed 94
SusWrite 39.8
20% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 9.6
36% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 61.9
DQ Write 32
DQ Mixed 16.1
20% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 78%
Adaptec Array 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 55 62 64 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.57% Terrible
Read 47.8
Write 58
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 58.2
10% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 2.2
13% 4.97 MB/s
DQ Read 4.8
DQ Write 7.7
DQ Mixed 2.8
3% 5.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5G41-M LE Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback