Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '21 at 21:25
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 214
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 781
73% 605 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gigabyte(1458 377E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 134
Reflection 148
Parallax 138
110% 140 fps
Gravity 146
Splatting 124
118% 135 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
806GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1308 1598 1612 1209 1132 1128 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1944
Write 1773
Mixed 691
SusWrite 1,331
321% 1,435 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 55.9
184% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 595
DQ Mixed 730
539% 714 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 248%
Great: 302%
Amd-raid HGST HUS726T6TAL 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: VKGN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 98 95 99 95 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 219
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 101
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.3
235% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 113%
Amd-raid Array 1 1.5TB
621GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 96 96 101 96 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 81.7
Write 99.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 91.2
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
142% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EACS-00D 1TB
786GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 71 71 71 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 67
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 68.3
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 42%
Amd-raid ST31000333AS 1TB
889GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 91 93 92 93 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 39
Write 102
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 90.4
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 36
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 30.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 106%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $928
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback