Fujitsu ESPRIMO P520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P520  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3220-A1
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141023
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '21 at 17:51
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 187
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 344
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Nvidia(10DE 1402) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.9% Poor
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 36.4
Parallax 29.3
25% 32.1 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 27.3
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 204 53 52 45 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 457
Write 378
Mixed 54
SusWrite 90.9
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 12
67% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 0.5
66% 154 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
84GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 86 85 83 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 84.2
Write 79.1
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 84.2
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P520 Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback