Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160520
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '21 at 20:20
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 161
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 431
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.1% Very good
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 97.2
Parallax 87.4
69% 89.8 fps
MRender 82.5
Gravity 88.7
Splatting 90.8
72% 87.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$80
495GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 367
Write 79.8
Mixed 118
SusWrite 78.2
35% 161 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 18.7
77% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 92.8
DQ Mixed 110
89% 128 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 128%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
411GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 303 346 342 350 340 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 382
Write 356
Mixed 334
SusWrite 330
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 28
91% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 285
223% 306 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78%
Great: 125%
Intenso Portable SSD 1TB
381GB free
Firmware: 0506
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 250 288 72 38 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 310
Write 284
Mixed 259
SusWrite 162
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 12.8
48% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 18.3
45% 93.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 14.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback