MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GP62 7QF
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '21 at 13:34
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 400
54% 402 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 115A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 7.3
5% 10.6 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTE110S 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111B1L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 515 520 86 89 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,402
Write 516
Mixed 602
SusWrite 300
155% 705 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 29
197% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 317
277% 406 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 151%
Great: 157%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
770GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 77.1
Mixed 55.1
50% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C16-8GRS Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 16GB
2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 22
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback