MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GP62 7QF
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 03:33
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 54.8
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 186
61% 112 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 289
44% 317 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 115A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 6.5
5% 10.2 fps
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTE110S 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111B1L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 215 116 108 144 232 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,269
Write 492
Mixed 580
SusWrite 190
139% 633 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 25
156% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 458
DQ Mixed 311
265% 383 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 126%
Great: 157%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
898GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 36 35 42 51 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 43.9
Write 27.7
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 37.8
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.1
36% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C16-8GRS Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 16GB
2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 47%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback