MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '21 at 08:57
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 72
1-Core 138
2-Core 267
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 692
72% 579 Pts
64-Core 689
43% 689 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 37.4
24% 32.9 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 31.3
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BT58SSD07S 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PAFEC2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 59 63 64 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 338
Write 86.9
Mixed 163
SusWrite 63.5
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 21.9
104% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 87.1
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 107
84% 113 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 77%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
37GB free
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 132 134 140 135 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 453
Write 322
Mixed 154
SusWrite 146
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 12.3
71% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 33.7
40% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron M378A1K43BB2G3A141 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback