HP Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 148B
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '21 at 01:09
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II Neo K325 Dual-Core
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 17.8
2-Core 39.7
28% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 39.4
8-Core 39.7
5% 39.6 Pts
64-Core 39.6
2% 39.6 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD M880G with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225
HP(103C 148B) 256MB
Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.712.1.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 58 78 70 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 70
Write 56.7
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 65.3
42% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT112S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B2873FHS-CH9 2GB
800, 800 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback