RM ONE 310

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRM ONE 310  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67OW
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '21 at 21:26
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 303
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 39.1
Parallax 47.3
30% 41 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 27
25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 133 141 141 141 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 336
Write 288
Mixed 232
SusWrite 158
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 29.8
98% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 73.3
DQ Mixed 41.1
35% 49 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
466GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 140 138 140 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 136
Write 131
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 139
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79%
Great: 74%
UFD USB Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID 6200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.7 7.2 7.7 7.8 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Read 28.3
Write 13.7
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 8.3
17% 15 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
26% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONE 310 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: RM ONE 310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback