Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 18:36
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 96.2
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 167
70% 115 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 411
43% 345 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 207
Reflection 195
Parallax 196
169% 199 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 150
Splatting 134
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 144%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 108 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 173
Write 110
Mixed 125
SusWrite 106
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 29.4
96% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 52.9
DQ Mixed 35.1
28% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
71GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 55 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 43
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 54.9
31% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
99GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 212 211 213 214 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 166
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 210
119% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 120%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback