Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H370M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 08:59
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$166
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 257
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 752
78% 629 Pts
64-Core 750
46% 750 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 37.4
29% 37.7 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 26.8
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.3
6% 8.27 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 310 321 314 293 298 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 466
Mixed 433
SusWrite 308
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 51.4
172% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 241
209% 311 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Kimtigo 240GB 240GB
50GB free
Firmware: R0327B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 285 72 46 72 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 502
Write 399
Mixed 344
SusWrite 162
78% 352 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 21.5
124% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 30.6
78% 158 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 102%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
48GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 314 317 316 316 318 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 472
Mixed 439
SusWrite 330
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 55.6
184% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 114%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
135GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 454 414 281 281 281 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 461
Mixed 433
SusWrite 360
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 55.4
184% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 353
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 116%
Great: 128%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 80 81 82 81 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 103
Write 107
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 79.3
115% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 41%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
43GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.5 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 88
Write 89.1
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 4.8
79% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 43%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
19GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.1 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 80.1
Write 49.2
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 0.4
60% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 73%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 80 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 205
Write 165
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 79.2
167% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 25.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 26.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $324
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback