Acer Nitro N50-600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-600
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '21 at 18:43
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 244
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 914
89% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,129
70% 1,129 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580X
Sapphire(174B F580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.4% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 48.6
34% 50.3 fps
MRender 60.6
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 44.2
37% 45.9 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 60 105 121 162 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
8GB free, PID 008f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 4 3.2 4.8 3.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Read 28.5
Write 3.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.2
11% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2666C15-4GVR 04CD F4-2666C15-4GVR Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-600 Builds (Compare 4,485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro N50-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback