Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190124
Uptime	5.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '21 at 15:58
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$265 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	99% Outstanding	Memory 87.8 1-Core 149 2-Core 298 97% 178 Pts	4-Core 592 8-Core 1,008 97% 800 Pts	64-Core 1037 64% 1037 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 105%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372C) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.1% Poor	Lighting 35.2 Reflection 17.6 Parallax 31.4 29% 28.1 fps	MRender 23.4 Gravity 32.4 Splatting 22.7 21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 28%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7210 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	6.03% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 9.9 Parallax 8.8 5% 8.2 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 7.7 Splatting 12 8% 10 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.03% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1005 851 824 695 581 557 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	284% Outstanding	Read 2,431 Write 2,216 Mixed 1,686 SusWrite 752 396% 1,771 MB/s	4K Read 54.9 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 76.6 254% 89.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,488 DQ Write 1,289 DQ Mixed 1035 872% 1,270 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 284% Great: 355%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB 7,767 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 221 283 200 257 179 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	Read 293 Write 240 Mixed 76.1 SusWrite 237 153% 212 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.9 264% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 123%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB 1,629 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 112GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 47 40 38 40 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 114 Write 39 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 45.9 76% 64 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.1 82% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 36%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB 1,629 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 166GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 51 53 39 39 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 116 Write 38.9 Mixed 54 SusWrite 45.2 75% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.2 100% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 36%
SanDisk SDDR-399 128GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2GB free, PID cfd2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 89.9 Write 81.1 Mixed 63.6 97% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 3.6 251% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C16 2x16GB 1,735 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.3% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 22.9 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 27.3 SC Mixed 22.5 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	887x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	547x
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	474x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	287x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	244x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	205x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	133x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $565

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16