Asus K72Jr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K72Jr  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K72Jr
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110125
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 20:31
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 33
2-Core 54.8
33% 48.2 Pts
4-Core 76.9
8-Core 80.7
10% 78.8 Pts
64-Core 79.2
5% 79.2 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Asus(1043 1BF2) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 236
Write 218
Mixed 219
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 22.8
74% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 142
109% 149 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CK0 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.7
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K72Jr Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K72Jr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback