Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201203
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '21 at 17:49
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 91.8 1-Core 164 2-Core 327 105% 194 Pts	4-Core 632 8-Core 1,191 109% 911 Pts	64-Core 2,273 141% 2,273 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Palit(1569 2204) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 5025 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (255 fps cap detected)	181% Outstanding	Lighting 255 Reflection 255 Parallax 255 208% 255 fps	MRender 255 Gravity 255 Splatting 192 187% 234 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87 58,572 User benchmarks, average bench 341% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,093 Write 3,298 Mixed 2,969 698% 3,120 MB/s	4K Read 72 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 96.1 312% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 975 DQ Write 884 DQ Mixed 938 701% 932 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 634GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1132 870 867 871 871 870 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB 4,330 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 38GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 22 20 22 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 39.6 Write 28.3 Mixed 31.6 SusWrite 21.3 39% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 5.6 535% 7.2 MB/s	DQ Read 8.6 DQ Write 7.4 DQ Mixed 6.4 501% 7.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 31,785 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	MC Read 80.1 MC Write 39.9 MC Mixed 42.2 154% 54.1 GB/s	SC Read 31.5 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 39.6 91% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,306x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $190Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	619x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $88Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	589x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	467x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	384x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	357x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	188x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	151x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	146x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	152x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	117x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	106x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $725

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16