bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '21 at 17:43
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3970X-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 197
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 574
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 717
44% 717 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
EVGA(3842 2081) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3870 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 188
Parallax 187
153% 188 fps
MRender 209
Gravity 163
Splatting 138
135% 170 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 138%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid Volume 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 304 291 213 273 277 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 1,001
Write 285
Mixed 303
SusWrite 277
102% 467 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 24
85% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 237
195% 282 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 101%
Pc401 NVMe SK hynix 1TB
554GB free
Firmware: 80007E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1260 1178 1177 1182 1180 1184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,476
Write 1,240
Mixed 1,312
SusWrite 1,193
294% 1,305 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 42.8
164% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 554
408% 544 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 206%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B485831383636433944332F3447582020 3x4GB
3 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 30.6
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback