Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '14 at 20:22
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 134
44% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 481
45% 375 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Sapphire(174B E241) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 43.2
28% 36.7 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 37.8
28% 33.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66% Good
Read 397
Write 360
Mixed 365
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 17.1
76% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 99.7
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 32
49% 91.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
831GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 142
Write 153
Mixed 130
106% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.21
56% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 0740 500GB
10GB free
Firmware: 1003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.2% Poor
Read 40.4
Write 37.3
Mixed 38.6
29% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.19
4K Mixed 0.04
9% 0.09 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 30%
Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback