Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U 23,686 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 70.6 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 161 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 444 45% 367 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ256MEE1OWX 256GB 5,615 User benchmarks, average bench 158% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0C0628 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,609 Write 1199 Mixed 23.6 206% 944 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 60.1 188% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 645 DQ Write 552 DQ Mixed 318 315% 505 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 210%
SDXC Card 257GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 163GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 25 25 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 14.6 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 24.6 28% 21 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 44% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E! 8GB 1,015 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	66.9% Good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 22 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 21.6 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 99.9 40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 76%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	277x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	240x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	75x

SSD
HFM256GDHTNG-8310A 256GBBench 111%, 4,680 samples	77x
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	73x
RPJTJ256MEE1OWX 256GBUmisBench 158%, 5,615 samples	49x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E! 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,570 samples	70x
RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E! 8GBRamaxelBench 60%, 1,015 samples	65x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	50x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16