Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190924
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '21 at 18:40
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180 65,122 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Memory 94.3 1-Core 142 2-Core 283 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 552 8-Core 820 85% 686 Pts	64-Core 817 51% 817 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 873F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3675 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.8% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 164 Parallax 7.1 88% 93 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 109 Splatting 103 94% 117 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Innovation IT 240GB 494 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 82 40 16 12 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 497 Write 397 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 67.9 53% 243 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 9.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 92%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 212GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 323 322 325 322 324 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 487 Mixed 452 SusWrite 343 101% 448 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 55.4 186% 63.9 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 353 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 2x8GB 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 23.9 87% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 31.6 SC Mixed 26.2 74% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 59 68% 59 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	445x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	252x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	226x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	145x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	136x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	105x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	69x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	85x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $524

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16