Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190924
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '20 at 06:08
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	77%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180 65,122 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Memory 92.6 1-Core 129 2-Core 268 90% 163 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 638 73% 572 Pts	64-Core 590 36% 590 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 873F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.1% Excellent	Lighting 118 Reflection 129 Parallax 112 96% 120 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 100 Splatting 19.9 63% 85.7 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Innovation IT 240GB 494 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 156 28 3.4 25 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 422 Write 331 Mixed 8.1 SusWrite 67.9 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.4 15% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 92%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 311GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 305 305 303 303 313 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 378 Write 421 Mixed 356 SusWrite 313 83% 367 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 90.1 4K Mixed 51.8 163% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 351 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 2x8GB 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.2% Very good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 19.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 23.1 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	445x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	252x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	226x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	145x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	136x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	105x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	69x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	85x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $524

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16