Asus P8H67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 06:42
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 201
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 369
51% 376 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1941 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48.1% Average
Lighting 62
Reflection 59.1
Parallax 76.7
50% 65.9 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 42.8
43% 54.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 90 97 93 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 105
Write 96.5
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 83.4
59% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA320 160GB
41GB free
Firmware: P22OABGA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 55.7
Write 54.5
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 38.4
34% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G JM1333KLN-4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback