Asus P8H67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '21 at 05:16
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 191
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 336
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1387 MHz, MLim: 1865 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 60.7
0% 39.9 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 45.4
Splatting 42.8
40% 49.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 102 101 83 78 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 98.4
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 90.8
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA320 160GB
9GB free
Firmware: P22OABGA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 45 41 34 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 39.5
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 39.2
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G JM1333KLN-4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback