Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 22:17
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 272
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,045
96% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,824
113% 1,824 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2857 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 190
Parallax 196
151% 190 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 186
Splatting 129
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,809
Write 1,537
Mixed 719
299% 1,355 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 67.1
240% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1389
DQ Write 945
DQ Mixed 954
770% 1,096 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
319GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 485 487 470 473 476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 464
Mixed 402
SusWrite 480
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 61.9
213% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 355
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
2.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 485 486 470 473 476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 493
Mixed 460
SusWrite 480
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 64.4
220% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 358
240% 294 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$200
172GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1304 957 1054 1086 1000 956 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,130
Write 2,091
Mixed 1,578
SusWrite 1,059
384% 1,714 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 71.2
255% 96.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,341
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 1,079
818% 1,111 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 279%
Great: 371%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
491GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 509 508 509 510 500 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 85% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 62.3
MC Mixed 32.9
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 10.7
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 108%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback