Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '21 at 18:23
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 77.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
88% 162 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 1,029
94% 787 Pts
64-Core 1,824
113% 1,824 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 189
Parallax 192
145% 186 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 185
Splatting 125
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 673 439 402 374 338 338 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,761
Write 1,468
Mixed 666
SusWrite 427
240% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 61.5
250% 98.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,377
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 1,031
798% 1,102 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 223%
Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
319GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 483 484 475 477 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 449
Mixed 410
SusWrite 478
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 62.9
196% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
2.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 483 484 475 477 477 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 464
Mixed 455
SusWrite 478
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 61.1
193% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 169
180% 298 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
183GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1180 1104 1114 1078 1046 1023 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,181
Write 1,963
Mixed 1,528
SusWrite 1,091
379% 1,691 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 84.4
280% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,320
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 1,050
797% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 290%
Great: 371%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
414GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 508 499 503 508 508 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 85% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 53.1
MC Mixed 30.3
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 10.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback