MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C08
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 18:24
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 526
70% 522 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.5% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 89.6
48% 69.3 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 43.9
44% 55.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1009 870 842 846 849 850 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,144
Write 1,003
Mixed 933
SusWrite 878
222% 989 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 78.4
272% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,614
DQ Write 1,273
DQ Mixed 1,435
1,076% 1,441 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 248%
Great: 280%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
433GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 280 294 302 299 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 432
Mixed 402
SusWrite 286
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 62
202% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 302
242% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 41.4
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 4.7
40% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 52%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 40.1
Write 41.6
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 37.1
54% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 22.3
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 3,875 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback