MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 18:03
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 83.2
83% 83.2 Pts
Poor: 76% Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1553 MHz, MLim: 1956 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 64.7
52% 66.6 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 56.4
51% 63.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1693 864 908 765 772 431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,717
Write 2,630
Mixed 1808
SusWrite 906
399% 1,765 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 86.2
285% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,429
DQ Write 1205
DQ Mixed 1,331
994% 1,322 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 271%
Great: 298%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 191 182 195 195 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 182
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 192
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
243% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 108%
Great: 212%
hp v265b 16GB
14GB free, PID ba07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 8.1 8.1 7.6 7.9 8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.9% Terrible
Read 24.6
Write 4.7
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 7.7
13% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.9%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.4
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 35.9
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback