Lenovo 20238

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20238  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime6 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 505
51% 414 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4279
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 6.8
4% 7.17 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 18 70 17 109 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.2% Below average
Read 113
Write 59.2
Mixed 158
SusWrite 67.1
22% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 17.3
75% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 41.9
57% 102 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 85%
WD WD3200BUCT-63TWBY0 320GB
90GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 46 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
30% Below average
Read 57.1
Write 56.1
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 47.2
38% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF RMT3170EB68F9W1600 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20238 Builds (Compare 1,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback