Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2HP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2HP (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100212
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '21 at 23:54
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 152 68% 110 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 404 42% 339 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% AMD(1002 0B04) 2GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Lighting 18.4 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 23.6 15% 22.5 fps	MRender 24.4 Gravity 17.8 Splatting 20 17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Exbom SSD-25SA120G 120GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 244 Write 218 Mixed 5.2 34% 156 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.2 22% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 79%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 90 91 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 93.7 Write 92.8 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 90 61% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 113%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 173GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 101 101 101 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 95.2 Write 73.3 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 101 60% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 62%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 754GB free Firmware: 0302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 30.4 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 19.7 20% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 63%
Samsung D3 Station 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 343GB free, PID 6123 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 26.7 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 17.2 34% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.2 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 62%
Mass Storage Device 1TB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 184GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 22.9 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 13.1 29% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 26%
Mass Storage Device 1.5TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 701GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 15 15 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 25.3 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 14.5 32% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 23%
SAMSUNG HM251JI 250GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 72GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.7% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 21.7 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 13.4 28% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.2% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6.3 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H55M-S2HP Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2HP

CPU
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	11x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	11x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	11x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	13x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	12x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	8x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $73

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16