Asrock P67 Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock P67 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 20:45
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 202
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 490
51% 411 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 36.7
23% 32.6 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 32
29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600256G 256GB
81GB free
Firmware: S4500104
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 367
Write 288
Mixed 328
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 37.5
123% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 42.1
DQ Write 93.3
DQ Mixed 55.7
46% 63.7 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 128%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
73GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 319
Write 158
Mixed 180
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 15.7
62% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 59.8
DQ Mixed 38.6
30% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Pro3 Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Pro3 - $94

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback