Compaq Evo D510 CMT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemCompaq Evo D510 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardCompaq 07E8h
Memory1.1 GB free of 1.50049 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20021230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 03:30
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 2.40GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Memory 35.7
1-Core 26.1
2-Core 25.6
21% 29.1 Pts
4-Core 24.9
8-Core 25.7
3% 25.3 Pts
64-Core 24.7
2% 24.7 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650
AMD(1002 1002) 512MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.3
1% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD400BB-60DGA0 40GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 51.1
Write 43
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 8.8
26% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 31%
Maxtor 90650U2 6GB
1GB free
Firmware: MA540UR0
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.03% Terrible
Read 15.4
Write 13.1
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 8.8
9% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 34GB
null MHz
1024, 512, 33280 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
4.97% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 1.2
MC Mixed 1.5
4% 1.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 0.7
4% 1.47 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback