Asus P7P55D-E EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E EVO  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100325
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '21 at 15:15
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 147
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 286
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 18.7
15% 18.4 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 16.9
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 120GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0510D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 56 57 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 259
Write 138
Mixed 170
SusWrite 54.1
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 18.9
69% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 122
94% 128 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 91%
Liteon IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: 9C08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 58 57 57 62 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 256
Write 128
Mixed 161
SusWrite 57.7
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 15.8
59% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 96.9
DQ Mixed 88.1
77% 115 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 98%
Tcsunbow X3 480GB
253GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 184 182 184 185 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 306
Write 299
Mixed 247
SusWrite 180
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 24.2
87% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 101
109% 181 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60%
Great: 99%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
486GB free
Firmware: M0CR050
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 187 189 188 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 338
Write 329
Mixed 287
SusWrite 184
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 18.3
74% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 242
182% 243 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
877GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 147 155 153 157 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 140
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 152
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Asmt ASM1352R-Safe 1TB
668GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 24.3
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 19.7
17% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E EVO Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback