Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '21 at 15:09
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 190
77% 130 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 292
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5117
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5.8
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2110 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 335 358 298 309 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 525
Write 496
Mixed 465
SusWrite 341
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 43.6
176% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 748
555% 731 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 127%
Great: 237%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
516GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 137 138 136 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 116
Write 79.7
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 137
65% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.6
318% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston HX316C10F/4 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston HX316C10F/4 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.7% Good
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 21.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback