Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '21 at 16:44
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 199
79% 134 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 293
40% 295 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5117
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 4.6
3% 3.47 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2110 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 387 412 432 366 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 572
Write 514
Mixed 496
SusWrite 395
111% 494 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 41.2
209% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 727
DQ Write 730
DQ Mixed 791
577% 749 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 141%
Great: 237%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
516GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 135 138 138 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 116
Write 79.4
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 137
65% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.7
331% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston HX316C10F/4 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston HX316C10F/4 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.7% Good
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback