Lenovo 82CG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82CG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200903
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '21 at 06:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 88.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 269
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 764
80% 641 Pts
64-Core 984
61% 984 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3FA2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 8.3
4% 22.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-4D256 256GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1S262
SusWrite @10s intervals: 542 275 172 138 134 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 912
Write 646
Mixed 649
SusWrite 234
136% 610 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 19.6
99% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 405
371% 567 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 109%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart Brazil SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG 04CB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 19
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82CG Builds (Compare 682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82CG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback