ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP EliteOne 800 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP EliteOne 800 G2 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8058
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160808
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '17 at 13:54
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 86.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 210 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 426 57% 425 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8058) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4551 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Lighting 6.73 Reflection 9.77 Parallax 6.56 6% 7.69 fps	MRender 8.67 Gravity 5.53 Splatting 13.4 8% 9.21 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 320GB free (System drive) Firmware: GS2OA3C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 198 100 100 (03) Spinup time 225 100 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 424 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 158 100 29 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 2983 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 421 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 4294967296 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1 (BE) vendor-specific 75 58 404291609 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 3 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2359332 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 83 83 175858 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	49.1% Average	Read 79.3 Write 92 Mixed 110 71% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.2 65% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 72%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	5.46% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 7.73 Mixed 5.26 11% 9.91 MB/s	4K Read 5.61 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.005 21% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.46% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 21.8 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 20.5 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback