| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F |
| Memory | 20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180529 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 02 '21 at 17:14 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
75%
Very good
|
70% 120 Pts
|
63% 529 Pts
|
58% 933 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
75.9%
Very good
|
76% 100 fps
|
75% 92.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
464GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 427 460 464 466 464 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
102% 452 MB/s
|
154% 52.5 MB/s
|
268% 359 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
31.1%
Below average
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
27% 9.47 GB/s
|
51% 78.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F Builds (Compare 32 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 7x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 5x |
| Xeon E5-2697 v2IntelBench 69%, 1,265 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon Pro WX 3100AMDBench 14%, 1,651 samples | 5x |
| Quadro FX 3800NvidiaBench 6%, 3,739 samples | 3x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 3x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples | 7x |
| 860 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 86%, 3,453 samples | 5x |
| 520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $258 |